Summary
This reading treats the repetition across Paul and Peter as evidence that the physical action belongs to the instruction. “Holy” does not remove the kiss but governs it: the greeting is to express pure affection, peace, equality, and recognised fellowship rather than romance or social advantage. Its form may still require agreed boundaries, such as same-sex practice or a kiss on the cheek.
What this contributes
It takes the bodily form and repeated imperative seriously, and it resists reducing Christian fellowship to an invisible sentiment. Brethren and Anabaptist traditions also show how the kiss could function as a public sign of reconciliation and belonging.
Question to keep in view
The letters do not prescribe one location or mode of kissing, and a physical kiss can communicate very different things across cultures. Any present practice must protect consent, safeguarding, and those for whom touch carries discomfort or risk.