Summary
This reading gives controlling weight to Jesus’ unqualified sayings in Mark 10 and Luke 16, Paul’s direction to remain unmarried or be reconciled, and the statements that a spouse is bound while the other lives. Matthew’s exception is read as permitting divorce without necessarily permitting remarriage, or as addressing sexual immorality discovered during betrothal. Serious adultery, abandonment, or violence may make separation unavoidable, but do not themselves dissolve the one-flesh bond.
What this contributes
It treats Jesus’ prohibition as a radical protection of marriage rather than a list of minimum conditions for ending it. It also prevents the conduct of an offending spouse from automatically determining the permanence of the innocent spouse’s covenant.
Question to keep in view
The view must explain why Matthew includes an exception and what Paul means when he says an abandoned believer is “not bound”. Its lifelong restriction on remarriage can place a profound burden on an innocent spouse and therefore requires substantial pastoral and communal support.